2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental investigation of utilizing the porous media model for windbreaks CFD simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are examples of full-scale wind tests [23,26,28], but project/site-specific tests are usually impractical and costly. Hence, with the increase in computational power today, CFD analysis is becoming increasingly popular [29]. The different computational approaches used to simulate the wind could be divided into mesh-based methods, which are most frequently used, and mesh-free/particle-based methods, such as SPH-smoothed particle hydrodynamics [30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Windbreak Performance Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are examples of full-scale wind tests [23,26,28], but project/site-specific tests are usually impractical and costly. Hence, with the increase in computational power today, CFD analysis is becoming increasingly popular [29]. The different computational approaches used to simulate the wind could be divided into mesh-based methods, which are most frequently used, and mesh-free/particle-based methods, such as SPH-smoothed particle hydrodynamics [30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Windbreak Performance Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Liu et al [35] bring up multiple issues with scaling when it comes to determining if the experimental results from windbreak research are directly applicable to actual conditions-both with the scaling of the structure itself and the implications that this has for the calculations, as well as with representing the natural wind in a simulation. Others have also raised concerns about the accuracy of scaled models for wind analysis [29,37,38]. Thus, the question of how accurate the models are should always be raised for each specific case.…”
Section: Windbreak Performance Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bulk-storage area was sparsely occupied, with six workers, and the individual ventilation rate was 0.43 m 3 /s/person (910 CFM/person), an order of magnitude higher than the required minimum ventilation rate of 0.005 m 3 /s/person (10 CFM/person) [39]. Storage racks were modeled using porous-media models [40][41][42]. Nelson [43] developed a server-rack porous media, and Ambaw [44] modeled a fruit box using porous media.…”
Section: Model Setups -Warehouse Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even though the wind velocity profiles around nets with relatively large porosities were reproduced well compared with the experimental results, there was a difference between the numerical and experimental values for nets with relatively small porosities. On the other hand, Mahgoub and Ghani [21] calculated the flow fields around windbreaks using a three-dimensional porous media model in which the tangential resistance was considered. However, the thickness of the windbreak used by them was significantly larger than those of the gauze used in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%