2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2022.109203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental investigation on a planar passive micromixer embedded with omega-shaped obstacles for rapid fluid mixing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Passive micromixing is a popular type of micromixer that requires no external Although known to attain high mixing efficiencies and quality, active micromixers have their limitations. The biggest drawback of active micromixers is their energy consumption [61]. The external energy source needed to promote mixing prevents the microchannel reactor system from being energy efficient.…”
Section: Micromixer Type Main Findings/mixing Methods Of Fluid Flow Y...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive micromixing is a popular type of micromixer that requires no external Although known to attain high mixing efficiencies and quality, active micromixers have their limitations. The biggest drawback of active micromixers is their energy consumption [61]. The external energy source needed to promote mixing prevents the microchannel reactor system from being energy efficient.…”
Section: Micromixer Type Main Findings/mixing Methods Of Fluid Flow Y...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that this mixer achieves high mixing performance and lower pressure drop when compared to zigzag, square wave, and grooved serpentine micromixers. Sun et al (2022) investigated some micromixers by varying the geometry of the walls and the size of omega-shaped obstacles along the path, and thus proposed to intensify the mixing through the generation of vortices, the change of the flow direction and the split and recombination of streams. With Reynolds numbers ranging from 0.01 to 50, the minimum mixing index value was 78% with a maximum pressure drop of 61.5k at Re=50.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though active micromixers offer the advantage of forcefully controlling flow, they also come with certain drawbacks, including higher consumption of energy, complex structure, and challenges in fabrication [ 2 , 5 ]. These limitations significantly impede active micromixers from being applied in microfluidic systems, particularly in the context of portability and cost-effectiveness [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%