2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-017-0309-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Application of Safe Thickness Between a Tunnel and Surrounding Concealed Caves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method comprises two types of attribute recognition models: one named the attribute recognition model in the design stage (ARM-D) and another named the attribute recognition model in the construction stage (ARM-C). Furthermore, commonly used numerical simulation methods, including the finite difference method (FDM) [36], finite element method (FEM) [37], particle flow code (PFC) [38], peridynamics (PD) [39], etc., have often been utilized to study the deformation mechanisms of the surrounding rock and support structures in karst tunnels, the protective layer thickness, the karst water seepage patterns, and risk assessment. Due to the simplification of tunnels, surrounding rocks, and karst caves as homogeneous, isotropic, and continuous media in modeling, the FEM method is able to better demonstrate its advantages [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method comprises two types of attribute recognition models: one named the attribute recognition model in the design stage (ARM-D) and another named the attribute recognition model in the construction stage (ARM-C). Furthermore, commonly used numerical simulation methods, including the finite difference method (FDM) [36], finite element method (FEM) [37], particle flow code (PFC) [38], peridynamics (PD) [39], etc., have often been utilized to study the deformation mechanisms of the surrounding rock and support structures in karst tunnels, the protective layer thickness, the karst water seepage patterns, and risk assessment. Due to the simplification of tunnels, surrounding rocks, and karst caves as homogeneous, isotropic, and continuous media in modeling, the FEM method is able to better demonstrate its advantages [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of numerical simulation, Qin et al [16] analysed the distribution law of releasable elastic strain energy and failure zone under different widths of concealed karst cave by FLAC3D. Shan et al [17] proposed a comprehensive numerical analysis method to determinate the safe thickness, and its rationality and effectiveness have been proved by field tests. Pan et al [18] investigated the mechanism of lagging water inrush in tunnel construction due to the proximity of a karst cavern with confined water via numerical simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhao et al [13] studied the stability of a rock pillar on a concealed karst cave in front of a tunnel and calculated the safe thickness of the rock pillar to prevent water inrush. Shan et al [14] analyzed the safe thickness between a tunnel and a nearby hidden cave and the factors influencing the rock-breaking mechanism and conducted numerical simulations and multiple regression analyses to study the safe distance between the tunnel and the karst cave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%