1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0955-5986(97)00017-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical aspects of flow computation through orifices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the flow symmetry along the x-axis, a 2-D axisymmetric simulation was used to calculate the flow field. To properly resolve regions with large velocity gradients, in all simulations the position of the first element in axial as well as in radial direction was approximately at 5.10 À4 Â d nozzle from the nozzle edge (Erdal and Andersson, 1997). Depending on the applied Re nozzle it was necessary to use 50-100 nodes over the nozzle radius and 200-300 nodes within the capillary.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Fluid Dynamic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the flow symmetry along the x-axis, a 2-D axisymmetric simulation was used to calculate the flow field. To properly resolve regions with large velocity gradients, in all simulations the position of the first element in axial as well as in radial direction was approximately at 5.10 À4 Â d nozzle from the nozzle edge (Erdal and Andersson, 1997). Depending on the applied Re nozzle it was necessary to use 50-100 nodes over the nozzle radius and 200-300 nodes within the capillary.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Fluid Dynamic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although RANS simulations could reasonably predict the discharge coefficient in certain simulations, first and second order statistics downstream of the orifice plate diverge significantly from experimental data. Erdal and Andersson (1997) demonstrate that the standard k-ε turbulence model does not accurately capture the physics of the flow especially around the region where the fluid accelerates across the pipe. A review of the literature has not found a simulation technique that can reasonably predict both the pressure drop and first and second order statistics downstream of the plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Erdal and Andersson (1997), in a two-dimensional axisymmetric simulation of an orifice plate with a standard and modified k-ε model, show that the pressure drop across the orifice plate is highly dependent on the grid refinement around the orifice plate and the turbulence model used. Shah et al (2012) model the orifice flow meter with a standard k-ε model and show that the pressure recovery downstream of the orifice plate is not well predicted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Turbulence is assumed to be a property of the carrier fluid phase, and turbulent flow is modeled using the k-ε RNG model, which, taking care of the effect of rapid strain in complex flow, it capable of predicting the gross flow behaviour in recirculating region (Pathak, 2011). The same choice was made by other authors who investigated similar kind of flows (Erdal and Anderssont, 1997;Frawley et al, 2010;Pathak, 2011). …”
Section: By the Following Correlation Attributed Tomentioning
confidence: 99%