2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa905a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical assessment and comparison of pulse wave velocity methods aiming at measuring aortic stiffness

Abstract: In conclusion, our computer model-based analyses demonstrate that for PWV methods based on peripheral signals, pulse transit time differences closely correlate with the aortic transit time, supporting the use of these methods in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This novel comparison was possible once we had established that the outputs of the various instruments used to measure these vascular parameters were not only correlated, but that PWV measured by specific equipment, as well as AIx, could be interchanged regardless of the process used to obtain these values. Similar observations were reported by Obeid et al [37], who compared PWV values measured at various locations in the arterial tree. Overall, these findings indicate that it is feasible under certain circumstances to compare the arterial stiffness outcomes of studies employing different instruments with different output values, specifically in relation to PWV and AIx, even though evidence suggesting the contrary has been published [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This novel comparison was possible once we had established that the outputs of the various instruments used to measure these vascular parameters were not only correlated, but that PWV measured by specific equipment, as well as AIx, could be interchanged regardless of the process used to obtain these values. Similar observations were reported by Obeid et al [37], who compared PWV values measured at various locations in the arterial tree. Overall, these findings indicate that it is feasible under certain circumstances to compare the arterial stiffness outcomes of studies employing different instruments with different output values, specifically in relation to PWV and AIx, even though evidence suggesting the contrary has been published [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, the significance of stiffness in the different arteries, namely the aorta, the muscular arteries and those of the microcirculation, remains to be fully elucidated [42, 43]. Nonetheless, while the arterial bed (and therefore arterial size) used to acquire the data may have a direct bearing on the numerical outputs obtained with each instrument, and thus the cut-off value that separates healthy from unhealthy vessels, this study and others [37] indicate the high degree of correlation for PWV between instruments is independent of the locations used to take the measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a common measure to estimate arterial stiffness (Obeid et al. 2017). There are a few variations in pulse wave velocity determination, such as the carotid–femoral, heart–ankle, brachial–ankle and finger–toe methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were observed in a set of pulse wave simulations in which resistance, heart cycle length, and maximal heart elastance were varied (Fig. 5 of [ 1 ]). The strong correlations in this set of simulations, hereafter set (a), suggest that under these conditions peripheral PTTs could be used to estimate aPTT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%