2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical assessment for the efficiencies of check dams in debris flow gullies: A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al [53] simulated the runout behavior of the Jiweishan landslide using a single-phase model based on PFC and verified the efficiency of the solver. Similar research work can be found in [54][55][56]. Therefore, in the presented study, the propagation of the Shaziba landslide was assumed to be a single-phase material for simplified calculation and the material's multi-phase nature was ignored, though the source material of the Shaziba landslide was saturated soil containing water and soil phases.…”
Section: Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Li et al [53] simulated the runout behavior of the Jiweishan landslide using a single-phase model based on PFC and verified the efficiency of the solver. Similar research work can be found in [54][55][56]. Therefore, in the presented study, the propagation of the Shaziba landslide was assumed to be a single-phase material for simplified calculation and the material's multi-phase nature was ignored, though the source material of the Shaziba landslide was saturated soil containing water and soil phases.…”
Section: Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Erosion caused by surface runoff can often provide a rich material source for the formation of debris flows, and can accelerate the formation of gullies [2,3]. Normally, a gully in which debris flows have occurred can be described as a debris flow gully [4,5]. Researchers often use the alluvial fans of debris flows at the outlet of the gullies as the defining marks in order to evaluate whether they are debris flow gullies [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although numerical simulation of landslide dynamic processes has achieved remarkable results, there are issues with each of the following three main approaches. The continuous medium approach, including smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) (Pastor et al, 2014), the material point method (MPM) (Soga et al, 2016), the finite-element method (FEM) (Muceku et al, 2016), the finite-volume method (FVM) (Pitman et al, 2003), and the finite-difference method (FDM) (Shen et al, 2020), is not very effective in describing particle separation and internal fracture of rockslides. The thin-layer models are based on the thin-layer approximation and depth-averaging process of the Navier-Stokes equations without viscosity, but a main issue is low computational accuracy (Moretti et al, 2012(Moretti et al, , 2015Yamada et al, 2016Yamada et al, , 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%