2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical assessment of transition in cutting mode and its effect on roughness creation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can see most of the high-temperature distribution at three regions as the pile-up forming (B), shear-slip (C), and flank face friction region (A). Region C is the contacting region between the head of the tool and the sample, and the primary source of heat primarily arises from frictional heat when the cutting tool rubs with the model [40]. The temperature region B is the rubbing region between the cutting chip and the front face of the cutting blade.…”
Section: The Cutting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can see most of the high-temperature distribution at three regions as the pile-up forming (B), shear-slip (C), and flank face friction region (A). Region C is the contacting region between the head of the tool and the sample, and the primary source of heat primarily arises from frictional heat when the cutting tool rubs with the model [40]. The temperature region B is the rubbing region between the cutting chip and the front face of the cutting blade.…”
Section: The Cutting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of hexagonal close packed (HCP), body center cubic (BCC), and amorphous structure reveals the phase transformation during the cutting process. The emission and nucleation of stacking fault (SF) and dislocation appear primary at the sample surface due to the release of the energy stored in the sample [40,43], as indicated in figures 5(a3) and (b3). Meanwhile, the subsurface deformation layer is created after dislocation propagation [44], as shown in figures 5(a2) and (b2).…”
Section: The Cutting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pan et al [13] used a second-order polynomial model to describe the surface roughness response. Nevertheless, when calculating the surface roughness of the workpiece using this model, comprehensive impact factors, such as tool wear [20], heat [9], material properties [21], and chip thickness, must be considered [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%