2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Calculation of Wind Loads over Solar Collectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported stable loads on the collectors from the fifth row and the fourth column from the edge on, which they defined as the interior part of the solar field. Mier-Torrecilla, Herrera, and Doblaré [6] confirmed the reduced load in the interior of the field in a numerical study. The importance of conducting transient simulations to adequately capture the effects of the wind on the collectors was highlighted in their study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…They reported stable loads on the collectors from the fifth row and the fourth column from the edge on, which they defined as the interior part of the solar field. Mier-Torrecilla, Herrera, and Doblaré [6] confirmed the reduced load in the interior of the field in a numerical study. The importance of conducting transient simulations to adequately capture the effects of the wind on the collectors was highlighted in their study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Hachicha et al (2013) estimated mean loads from an LES of a geometrically two-dimensional PTSC with a periodic boundary in the spanwise direction and a steady, uniform approach flow. Time-varying inlet boundary conditions were first used with LES in Mier-Torrecilla et al (2014) to estimate both mean and root-mean-square (RMS) wind loads of a threedimensional model. Through appropriate modelling of the atmospheric boundary layer, the mean loads were shown to be within 10% of experimental reference data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an isolated Parabolic Trough collector without torque tube, the drag, lift and momentum coefficients are respectively around 1, 0.5 and 0.6 according to Mier-Torrecilla's study [16] and around 2, 2 and 0.2 according to Hosoya's study [17] for the worse position. Thus, according to the results previously presented, for the same aperture, the drag, lift and torque applied to the mirrors of a LFR module are respectively around 5 to 10 times, 1.2 to 8 times and 50 to 150 times lower than for the Parabolic Trough module.…”
Section: Comparison With Parabolic Troughmentioning
confidence: 99%