2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2013.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical comparison of airborne particles deposition and dispersion in radiator and floor heating systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oztop et al • Following [9][10][11][12]14], it is assumed that for such low volume fractions of solid particles considered here the particles have negligible effects on the flow field (one-way coupling); • The initially stagnant particles are distributed randomly inside the cavity; • Local thermal equilibrium is assumed between the particle and the ambient fluid; • The rebound Particles are considered sticky, i.e., they will stick to the surface when they come in contact with the walls. Considering the low concentration of particles, this widely-used assumption [e.g., in 9,11,14,18], should not affect the results significantly.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Oztop et al • Following [9][10][11][12]14], it is assumed that for such low volume fractions of solid particles considered here the particles have negligible effects on the flow field (one-way coupling); • The initially stagnant particles are distributed randomly inside the cavity; • Local thermal equilibrium is assumed between the particle and the ambient fluid; • The rebound Particles are considered sticky, i.e., they will stick to the surface when they come in contact with the walls. Considering the low concentration of particles, this widely-used assumption [e.g., in 9,11,14,18], should not affect the results significantly.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, their results showed that the effects of thermophoretic lead to more particles to be deposited on the cold walls. Golkarfard et al [14] numerically examined the deposition and dispersion of airborne particles in radiator and floor heating systems in a turbulent flow regime. Their results indicated that percentage of suspended particles in radiator heating system was higher than that of the floor heating for any of the specified particle diameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…particle deposition on heat exchanger surfaces can reduce the heat transfer rate and adversely affect the energy efficiency of these equipment [8,9]. Therefore, several studies have been carried out to understand this problem using Eulerian-Lagrangian methods [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although particle behaviors in a space is introduced as the most critical disadvantages of floor heating systems, there are limited studies on this subject. Golkarfard and Talebizadeh were numerically compared floor and radiator heating systems in terms of particle distribution, whose diameter is between 3 and 10 µm, in a room [11]. They found that, particle concentration in radiator heating was found higher than floor heating system for all investigated particle diameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%