2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical comparisons of finite element stabilized methods for a 2D vortex dynamics simulation at high Reynolds number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To allow coarsening of the ONERA-D mesh in the free stream by mesh adaptation, we used a streamline-upwind Petrov–Galerkin method associated with a grad–div stabilization for solving the baseflow equations (Franca, Frey & Hughes 1992; Ahmed & Rubino 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To allow coarsening of the ONERA-D mesh in the free stream by mesh adaptation, we used a streamline-upwind Petrov–Galerkin method associated with a grad–div stabilization for solving the baseflow equations (Franca, Frey & Hughes 1992; Ahmed & Rubino 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [70], the stabilized formulations for the fully-implicit log-morphology equation is adopted and applied to the centrifugal ventricular assist device: it is shown that the VMS stabilized formulation has better convergence behaviour and superior stabilization properties compared to the SUPG one. On the other hand, in [69] the numerical tests carried out revealed that both SUPG and VMS-LES methods exhibit comparable accuracy and they conclude that for their case the SUPG stabilization method is accurate enough. However, in our experience, we found that, as the mesh is refined, comparable results are achieved with SUPG and VMS-LES methods: the role of the turbulence model hence vanishes as the mesh becomes finer, which is coherent with the standard definition of a LES model.…”
Section: Mesh Convergence and Comparison Of Supg And Vms-lesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As in [19], for the time discretization, a semi-implicit Backward Differentiation Formula of order two (BDF2) has been applied (see [2] for further details), with time step ∆t = 2 • 10 −3 s. Time integration is performed until a final time T = 7 s. In the time period [0, 5] s, after an initial spin-up, the flow is expected to develop to full extent, including a subsequent relaxation time. Afterwards, it reaches a periodic-in-time (statistically-or quasi-steady) state.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%