2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2005.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical computation of buoyant airflows confined to attic spaces under opposing hot and cold wall conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first category, sealed attic configuration is considered, and the problem is usually represented by natural convection in triangular enclosures. As reviewed by Kamiyo et al [5] and by Saha and Khan [6], a considerable number of experimental and numerical studies in this category (e.g., [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]) have been devoted to the analysis of flow and heat transfer under laminar conditions, while only a few studies (e.g., [17,18]) investigated turbulent flow and heat transfer, although the air flow in real residential attics is almost always turbulent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first category, sealed attic configuration is considered, and the problem is usually represented by natural convection in triangular enclosures. As reviewed by Kamiyo et al [5] and by Saha and Khan [6], a considerable number of experimental and numerical studies in this category (e.g., [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]) have been devoted to the analysis of flow and heat transfer under laminar conditions, while only a few studies (e.g., [17,18]) investigated turbulent flow and heat transfer, although the air flow in real residential attics is almost always turbulent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison study is performed by Ridouane et al (2005) where the authors compare their numerical results produced for two different boundary conditions, (a) cold base and hot inclined walls (b) hot base and cold inclined walls with the experimental results obtained by Flack (1980;1979). A good agreement has been obtained between the numerical predictions and the experimental measurements of Nusselt number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Subject to the Boussinesq approximation, they are written The validity of the Boussinesq approximation in the present context is corroborated by Gray and Giorgini [9], since they reported that the results would deviate of at most 3% from the corresponding non-Boussinesq solution. Also, in the process of validating their code, Ridouane et al [10] reexamined the benchmark numerical study of natural convection of air in a square enclosure carried out by de Vahl Davis [11]. Results obtained without enforcing the Boussinesq approximation were just 2% different from the benchmark solution.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%