2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical computation of the crack development and SIF in composite materials with XFEM and SFEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dimitri and al. 6 proposed the application of the level set method combined with the numerical extended finite element method (XFEM) to predict the fracture direction of propagation within a specimen, and to compute the stress intensity factor for cracked plates under different loading conditions. Using the maximum energy release rate criterion and interaction integrals, Kim and Paulino 7 simulated the crack propagation in FGMs, under mixed-mode and non-proportional loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimitri and al. 6 proposed the application of the level set method combined with the numerical extended finite element method (XFEM) to predict the fracture direction of propagation within a specimen, and to compute the stress intensity factor for cracked plates under different loading conditions. Using the maximum energy release rate criterion and interaction integrals, Kim and Paulino 7 simulated the crack propagation in FGMs, under mixed-mode and non-proportional loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a safety factor, the reciprocal of the normalized stress intensity factor shown in part (6) of Table 3 is used as the joint plane spatial formation factor, as shown in part (7). The distribution curve (Figure 13) of the joint plane spatial formation factor of various joint plane angles shows that as the angle continuously increases, the equivalent strength of the twisted joint plane also increases; when the angle is 5 ∘ , the joint plane spatial formation factor is 1.02, which means that Note: (1) is the average equivalent stress intensity factor of the twisted joint plane in a square plate under uniaxial tensile loading; (2) is the average equivalent stress intensity factor of the twisted joint plane in a square plate under shear loading; (3) is the average equivalent stress intensity factor of the twisted joint plane in a semicylindrical arch dam with the slope angle of 30 ∘ under temperature drop loading; (4) is the average equivalent stress intensity factor of the twisted joint plane in a semicylindrical arch dam with the slope angle of 45 ∘ under temperature drop loading; (5) is the average equivalent stress intensity factor of the twisted joint plane of in semicylindrical arch dam with the slope angle of 60 ∘ under temperature drop loading; (6) is the lowest value of the normalized stress intensity factor shown in columns (1)∼(5); (7) is the joint plane spatial formation factor.…”
Section: Discussion and Modification Of The Existing Equivalent Strenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to facilitate its application in design, we used a regression fit function on the joint plane spatial formation factor of various plane angles, and we were able to obtain a best-fit equation, shown as (7), with the correlation coefficient of 0.9995.…”
Section: Discussion and Modification Of The Existing Equivalent Strenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,12 It has been well known that it is challenging for mesh-based methods like the finite element methods (FEMs) to capture the fracture and separation of materials. 13 The capabilities of the FEMs can be can greatly extended by different enhancements, like the extended FEM [14][15][16][17][18] and similar approaches such as strong discontinuity approach [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and enhanced assumed strain. [26][27][28][29] However, they are usually mathematically complicated while still not being able to resolve all inherent issues of the FEMs in handling severe mesh distortion and fragmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%