AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2021 Forum 2021
DOI: 10.2514/6.2021-3457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical continuation of the interaction of flutter and forced response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements of the tuned configuration are seen to follow the theoretical predictions obtained using simplified models [5,6]. There is a clear switching between flutter (away from resonance) and synchronous response (locked to the forcing) near resonance, and the measured frequencies are in good agreement with the FEM and linear CFD calculations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurements of the tuned configuration are seen to follow the theoretical predictions obtained using simplified models [5,6]. There is a clear switching between flutter (away from resonance) and synchronous response (locked to the forcing) near resonance, and the measured frequencies are in good agreement with the FEM and linear CFD calculations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These methodologies still consider the different sources of vibration independently and, when both effects are present on the solution, the linear superposition of both vibration amplitudes is assumed. However, some recent theoretical studies using mass-spring models and asymptotically reducedorder models (ROM) have shown that this superposition could lead to a too conservative prediction of the blade displacements [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%