2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37143-1_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Coupled Modeling of Water Hammer in Quasi-rigid Thin Pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A FEM scheme was used by [52] for both the fluid and the structure. Time interpolation and wave adjustment methods are compared for MOC-MOC solutions in [106,107]. A hybrid MOC-FEM approach, MOC for the fluid and FEM for the structure, was used in [48], experimental data was used for model verification.…”
Section: Two Degree-of-freedom Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A FEM scheme was used by [52] for both the fluid and the structure. Time interpolation and wave adjustment methods are compared for MOC-MOC solutions in [106,107]. A hybrid MOC-FEM approach, MOC for the fluid and FEM for the structure, was used in [48], experimental data was used for model verification.…”
Section: Two Degree-of-freedom Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al (1994) used a FEM scheme for both the fluid and the structure. In Bouabdallah & Massouh (1997) and Ghodhbani & Hadj-Taïeb (2013), time interpolation and wave adjustment methods are compared for MOC-MOC solutions. Wiggert (1983) used a hybrid MOC-FEM approach, MOC for the fluid and FEM for the structure, and experimental data was used for model verification.…”
Section: Two Degree-of-freedom Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%