2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(02)00238-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical delineation of transient capture zones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a normally gaining stream (receiving groundwater) may change into an alternating losing and gaining stream depending on ATES operation. It should be noted that although capture zones in spatial planning are often considered a steady state feature, in reality, the location will vary because of the transient nature of groundwater recharge and surface water-groundwater interactions (Rock and Kupfersberger 2002). The effect of transient pumping at an ATES system can act cumulatively and exacerbate this variation.…”
Section: Hydrological Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a normally gaining stream (receiving groundwater) may change into an alternating losing and gaining stream depending on ATES operation. It should be noted that although capture zones in spatial planning are often considered a steady state feature, in reality, the location will vary because of the transient nature of groundwater recharge and surface water-groundwater interactions (Rock and Kupfersberger 2002). The effect of transient pumping at an ATES system can act cumulatively and exacerbate this variation.…”
Section: Hydrological Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaleris et al 1995;Rayne et al 2001;Fleming et al 2002;Kamra et al 2002;Peng et al 2002;Rock & Kupfersberger 2002). But the applications of most of these studies have focused mainly on capture zone delineation for wellhead protection, aquifer parameter determination, groundwater pathline and travel time studies, point concentration profile studies, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation can have a direct impact on the size and location of the capture zone of a groundwater abstraction well field and is explained conceptually in Figure 2.1. It should be noted that while capture zones in spatial planning are often considered a steady state feature, in reality the location will vary due to the transient nature of groundwater recharge and surface water-groundwater interactions (Rock & Kupfersberger, 2002). Situation B shows the impact that an ATES system may have on the groundwater flow paths towards the extraction well.…”
Section: Hydrological Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%