2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10958-007-0542-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical diagnosis of blow-up of solutions of pseudoparabolic equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computation method on condensing grids allows one to do this. But it can also help us to diagnose the blow‐up moment of the exact solution . The main formulas of this paragraph have been proposed it the works; now, we use it for our purpose.In compliance with the fact that we approximate all spatial variables in by finite difference with accuracy O ( h 2 ) and we use the CROS1 scheme with accuracy O ( τ 1 ) for numerical integration of , the constructed method of solving the Equation is of accuracy O ( τ 1 + h 2 ).Let us perform the computation of the solution u ( x , t ) on the start grid { x n , t m }, 0≤ n ≤ N , 0≤ m ≤ M .…”
Section: Numerical Localization Of Blow‐upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The computation method on condensing grids allows one to do this. But it can also help us to diagnose the blow‐up moment of the exact solution . The main formulas of this paragraph have been proposed it the works; now, we use it for our purpose.In compliance with the fact that we approximate all spatial variables in by finite difference with accuracy O ( h 2 ) and we use the CROS1 scheme with accuracy O ( τ 1 ) for numerical integration of , the constructed method of solving the Equation is of accuracy O ( τ 1 + h 2 ).Let us perform the computation of the solution u ( x , t ) on the start grid { x n , t m }, 0≤ n ≤ N , 0≤ m ≤ M .…”
Section: Numerical Localization Of Blow‐upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it can also help us to diagnose the blow‐up moment of the exact solution . The main formulas of this paragraph have been proposed it the works; now, we use it for our purpose.In compliance with the fact that we approximate all spatial variables in by finite difference with accuracy O ( h 2 ) and we use the CROS1 scheme with accuracy O ( τ 1 ) for numerical integration of , the constructed method of solving the Equation is of accuracy O ( τ 1 + h 2 ).Let us perform the computation of the solution u ( x , t ) on the start grid { x n , t m }, 0≤ n ≤ N , 0≤ m ≤ M . Since the theoretical accuracy order in the time is equal to 1 and, in the spatial variable, is equal to 2, we perform a sequential condensation of the time grid by integer number of times r t and spatial grid by integer number of times r x (the most convenient choice is r t =4 and r x =2 as rt1=rx2[for more explanations, see Kalitkin et al]).…”
Section: Numerical Localization Of Blow‐upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For numerical solving of this implicit system of ODEs (), we use Rosenbrock scheme with complex coefficient (CROS1) that is the best choice for solving such kind of problems because of its order of accuracy ( O ( τ 1 )), monotonicity, and stability . It is very important to mention that Rosenbrock scheme with complex coefficient would have order of accuracy O ( τ 2 ) in the case of constant matrix M . The implicit system of ODEs with such constant matrix can be obtained if we introduce additional auxiliary variable v = u x x − e ε u in ().…”
Section: Numerical Localization Of Blow‐upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the nodes of the start grid are those of all subsequent grids. At these points, we estimate (see, e.g., ) the error: normalΔ(rxN,rtM)(x,t)=u(rxN,rtM)(x,t)u(N,M)(x,t)rt11+o()τ1+h2 and the effective accuracy order: peff(x,t)=normallogrtu(rxN,rtM)(x,t)u(N,M)(x,t)u()rx2N,rt2M(x,t)u(rxN,rtM)(x,t). At each points ( x , t ), where peff(x,t)N,Mptheor=1, the solution of the problem has bounded first derivatives in time and second derivative in the spatial variables, and the error estimate is asymptotically sharp as N , M → ∞ . The violation of convergence () indicates the loss of smoothness of the exact solution.…”
Section: Numerical Localization Of Blow‐upmentioning
confidence: 99%