1979 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility 1979
DOI: 10.1109/isemc.1979.7568787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Electromagnetic Code (NEC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
115
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the transient response of the induced current at the location B, obtained using the proposed method and the frequency domain NEC04 code [11] combined with the Inverse Fourier Transform.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 shows the transient response of the induced current at the location B, obtained using the proposed method and the frequency domain NEC04 code [11] combined with the Inverse Fourier Transform.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having validated the proposed method with NEC04 [11], one uses the parametric transformation by the method of pencils. This transformation provides us to reconstruct the response of the cable (the induced current) with a minimum number of frequencies and also allows us to define the modal energies.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of using the Fresnel plane-wave reflection coefficient is also shown in figure 5 and, as expected, is accurate for h/X greater than about 0.1. The CPU time for evaluating all field components in equation (6) by the discrete image method on a DEC 3000/400 computer was 89 ps with 3 images for each potential and 283 ps with 10 images. For comparison, the time for a single evaluation by the NEC-2 interpolation is 7.2 p. The difference is mainly due to the number of complex exponentials that must be evaluated.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data in Figure 7 the fields and currents was also offered. However, modeling was performed using NEC [6] to an~yze an end-driven wire very close (h=5/8 inches) to a ground (8, = 6, c = 0.006 S/m) with a single strand of perfectly conducting rebar that was buried at six inches. The effects on the wire current distribution were negligible except when the wire and rebar were parallel and aligned in the vertical plane.…”
Section: The Acquired Datamentioning
confidence: 99%