2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical evaluation of the energetic performances of structured and random packed beds in regenerative thermal oxidizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 is lower than that nearby bed A because the burner located in the combustion chamber is closer to bed A. The air temperature in bed B shown by (6) in Fig. 1 continues to decrease due to heat transfer to the ceramic packings in bed B.…”
Section: Rto Performance Testmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 is lower than that nearby bed A because the burner located in the combustion chamber is closer to bed A. The air temperature in bed B shown by (6) in Fig. 1 continues to decrease due to heat transfer to the ceramic packings in bed B.…”
Section: Rto Performance Testmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Tel. : +886 2 2182 2928x6277; fax: +886 2 25861939. oxidizers (RTO) have been widely used for VOC control in industries with heat recovery up to 95% [4][5][6][7][8]. When the VOC concentration fed to RTO is above 3% of its lower explosion limit (LEL), the RTO system can maintain its normal performance and completely combust the VOCs to carbon dioxide and water without supplementary fuel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detail on the model and on the relative validation are reported in the literature [28][29][30]. As far as the heat transfer coefficient is concerned, various correlations are present in the literature.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations were solved with a finite difference scheme [17,18]. Mass flow was presumed to remain constant within each time step, but was varied between consecutive time steps to achieve the needed mass flow profile.…”
Section: Random Packed-bed Regeneratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%