2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical experiments on ice-structure interaction in shallow water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here this type of protective effect, however, appeared to be weak: Both the mean and the peak horizontal loads applied on the bottom were 5 ⋯ 36% of those induced on the structure (Table 3). This result agrees well with the results from finite-discrete element simulations conducted by Lemström et al [4], who observed a ratio 𝐹 𝑏 𝑝 ∕𝐹 𝑝 of approximately 14% with a similar water depth to ice thickness ratio. Earlier work [1][2][3] suggests that a grounded rubble pile protects the structure from high ice loads.…”
Section: Grounding and Bottom Loadssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Here this type of protective effect, however, appeared to be weak: Both the mean and the peak horizontal loads applied on the bottom were 5 ⋯ 36% of those induced on the structure (Table 3). This result agrees well with the results from finite-discrete element simulations conducted by Lemström et al [4], who observed a ratio 𝐹 𝑏 𝑝 ∕𝐹 𝑝 of approximately 14% with a similar water depth to ice thickness ratio. Earlier work [1][2][3] suggests that a grounded rubble pile protects the structure from high ice loads.…”
Section: Grounding and Bottom Loadssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Sideways motion of the ice was constrained by vertical plexiglass panels on each side of the structure. The water depth was selected based on results from two-dimensional finite-discrete element simulations conducted by Lemström et al [4], so that the rubble pile would have room to grow, yet also ground in all experiments.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then a mathematical model is established to determine the static ice load [ 15 , 16 ]. The advantage is that the known factors can be input into the model as parameters, but its theoretical calculations are complex, boundary conditions are not easy to measure, accuracy is low and real-time capability is bad [ 17 , 18 ]. The in-situ observation method needs to deploy some pressure sensors (such as biaxial stress sensors [ 19 ] and strain gauges [ 20 , 21 ]) in advance at the hydraulic facility, and the pressure variation data inside the ice layer can be obtained through manual timing observation and recording.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%