2017
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-4187-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical framework for the computation of urban flux footprints employing large-eddy simulation and Lagrangian stochastic modeling

Abstract: Abstract. Conventional footprint models cannot account for the heterogeneity of the urban landscape imposing a pronounced uncertainty on the spatial interpretation of eddycovariance (EC) flux measurements in urban studies. This work introduces a computational methodology that enables the generation of detailed footprints in arbitrarily complex urban flux measurements sites. The methodology is based on conducting high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) and Lagrangian stochastic (LS) particle analysis on a m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last years, the embedded LPM has been successfully used to study scalar dispersion in urban environments (e.g. Auvinen et al, 2017;Lo and Ngan, 2017;Gronemeier and Sühring, 2019). The LPM is based on Weil et al (2004) to separate the particle speed into a deterministic and a stochastic contribution, which corresponds to dividing the turbulent flow field into a resolvedscale and a SGS portion, respectively.…”
Section: Lagrangian Particle Model Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years, the embedded LPM has been successfully used to study scalar dispersion in urban environments (e.g. Auvinen et al, 2017;Lo and Ngan, 2017;Gronemeier and Sühring, 2019). The LPM is based on Weil et al (2004) to separate the particle speed into a deterministic and a stochastic contribution, which corresponds to dividing the turbulent flow field into a resolvedscale and a SGS portion, respectively.…”
Section: Lagrangian Particle Model Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the systems are located at 60.3 m which is 2.5 times the mean building height and therefore they should be above the roughness sublayer and blending height where local-scale surface sources and sinks have aggregated together (Raupach et al, 1991). The centre of Helsinki is located on a peninsula, but previous analyses on the source area of EC1 system have shown the flux footprint to lie above the city and not the sea (Kurppa et al, 2015;Auvinen et al, 2017). The downside of the measurement location is that the upper masonry disturbs the flow and we choose to neglect 30 data for certain wind directions based on quality considerations.…”
Section: Measurement Site and Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, other PALM-4U components, such as chemistry and indoor climate modules, have or are currently being implemented in the PALM model system to develop a modern and highly-efficient urban climate model. Due to its excellent scalability on massively parallel computer architectures, PALM is applicable for carrying out computationally expensive simulations over large, neighbourhood-and city-scale domains with a sufficiently high grid resolution for urban LES (Auvinen et al, 2017;Xie and Castro, 2006). The performance of PALM over urban-like surfaces has been successfully evaluated against wind tunnel simulations, previous LES studies and field measurements (Kanda et al, 2013;Letzel et al, 2008;Park et al, 2015;Razak et al, 2013).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%