2006
DOI: 10.1049/ip-epa:20060047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical impulse response test to estimate circuit-model parameters for induction machines

Abstract: Numerical impulse response test to estimate circuit-model parameters for induction machines.Abstract: The estimation of electrical parameters of a cage induction machine is studied. First, the steady-state parameters are estimated using two-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) with the assumption of sinusoidal time variation. Next, a numerical impulse response test using timestepping FEA is utilised to produce the voltage-current data for the small-signal model parameter estimation. The method is based on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameters of a 37-kW squirrel-cage induction machine were estimated using the numerical impulse response test [13,18] based on the data obtained from time-stepping FEA [12]. The machine is equipped with deep rotor bars and closed rotor slots; the cross-section of a rotor bar is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters of a 37-kW squirrel-cage induction machine were estimated using the numerical impulse response test [13,18] based on the data obtained from time-stepping FEA [12]. The machine is equipped with deep rotor bars and closed rotor slots; the cross-section of a rotor bar is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constant parameter values can be identified by the well-known methods (Holopainen et al, 2004;Laiho et al, 2008;Repo & Arkkio, 2006). The results obtained by using finite-element (FE) model as the "real" process have been good and accurate (Laiho et al, 2007), when both prediction error method (PEM) and subspace identification (SUB) have been used.…”
Section: Modeling and Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the number of time-stepping FEA simulations required for gathering frequency-response data can be significantly reduced as compared to harmonic excitation. Here, the voltage pulse is defined by [14] The results of time-stepping computations were transformed to the frequency domain using DFT. Since two pulse tests were made, it was possible to calculate all four small-signal admittances Y dd (jω), Y dq (jω), Y qd (jω), and Y qq (jω).…”
Section: ) Voltage-pulse Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification data is produced using time-stepping finiteelement analysis (FEA) [13] and locked-rotor measurements. Voltage pulses [14] and pulsating voltage-signal injection are used as excitation signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%