2003
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v008.i13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Integration inS-PLUSorR: A Survey

Abstract: This paper reviews current quadrature methods for approximate calculation of integrals within S-Plus or R. Starting with the general framework, Gaussian quadrature will be discussed first, followed by adaptive rules and Monte Carlo methods. Finally, a comparison of the methods presented is given. The aim of this survey paper is to help readers, not expert in computing, to apply numerical integration methods and to realize that numerical analysis is an art, not a science.Calculations were made on a Sun SPARC Ul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, if g j (·| x j , θ ) does not exist in closed form, numerical integration techniques (e.g., adaptive Gaussian quadrature) could be used to evaluate g j (·| x j , θ ) at Ypj and thus facilitate the maximization of . However, it is well known that the computational burden associated with implementing these numerical techniques rapidly increases with the dimension of the integral, making this approach infeasible for c j >2; for further discussion, see . Further, numerical integration techniques, like the adaptive Gaussian quadrature, may perform poorly for peaked‐integrand distribution functions .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, if g j (·| x j , θ ) does not exist in closed form, numerical integration techniques (e.g., adaptive Gaussian quadrature) could be used to evaluate g j (·| x j , θ ) at Ypj and thus facilitate the maximization of . However, it is well known that the computational burden associated with implementing these numerical techniques rapidly increases with the dimension of the integral, making this approach infeasible for c j >2; for further discussion, see . Further, numerical integration techniques, like the adaptive Gaussian quadrature, may perform poorly for peaked‐integrand distribution functions .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there is no analytical solution available for them, a numerical integration was used to obtain these values. The numerical integration was carried out by adaptive quadrature [10] of functions implemented in the function ‘ quadinf ’ of an R package pracma . In order to optimize Equation (5), the R function ‘ nlminb ’ was used for optimization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results provide further evidence that the functions given here are correct, and in fact are superior to numerical integration in obtaining moments, since it only requires a simple evaluation of a polynomial with integer coefficients. Numerical integration using adaptive methods was also implemented but worked poorly for higher dimensions (Kuonen 2003).…”
Section: R Functions To Compute Normal Multivariate Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%