2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.05.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical integration of detector response functions via Monte Carlo simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Details of the Chi-Nu experimental setup and data analysis techniques can be found in Refs. [24,26,[28][29][30], and so only the essential details will be repeated here. The neutron spectra analyzed in this paper were measured with an array of 54 liquid scintillator detectors placed at angles corresponding to the surface of a hemisphere at a target-to-detector distance of ≈ 1 m with an actinide-containing parallel-plate avalanche counter target [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the Chi-Nu experimental setup and data analysis techniques can be found in Refs. [24,26,[28][29][30], and so only the essential details will be repeated here. The neutron spectra analyzed in this paper were measured with an array of 54 liquid scintillator detectors placed at angles corresponding to the surface of a hemisphere at a target-to-detector distance of ≈ 1 m with an actinide-containing parallel-plate avalanche counter target [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 of Ref. [7]). However, this assumption is incorrect for the majority of detected neutrons because it can be rare for a neutron to have exactly zero scatters between creation within the target and detection.…”
Section: The Chi-nu 6 Li-glass Detector Response Matrixmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…following references [9,43,52]. The key difference here is that the multiple-scattering and attenuation correction merge with the neutron-detection efficiency to an environmental detector-response matrix, R, of the TOF measurement, while the variable û encompasses all other corrections mentioned above and is not written out explicitly.…”
Section: Pfns Shape Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The background, b, can assume values at some E out that are even larger than the signal one wants to measure [9]. This is especially true at E out < 100 keV [13,38,42,52,66]. Background can arise from γs in γ-sensitive neutron detectors, beam contaminations (e.g., secondary-neutron group, protons or charged particles in the beam), wrap-around neutrons (dependent on spacing between source-neutron pulses), from pile-up of incident neutrons, room-return, random coincidences, α-particles from the sample, etc.…”
Section: Background Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%