2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2014.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation and design of cold-formed steel built-up open section columns with longitudinal stiffeners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress-strain curve used in the finite element analysis (FEA) for the CFS profiles was based on tensile coupon test results and at the same time on other studies of literature [14,15,17,23], with a nominal yield strength of 320 MPa, a tensile strength of 390 MPa and a modulus of elasticity of 210 GPa. Residual stresses and cold-work of forming (where the apparent yield stress in the corners is increased) were ignored in these analyses, in other words, the mechanical properties of steel were assumed to be uniform across the crosssection, like other researchers in this field did [9,24]. The thermal properties of the CFS sections at elevated temperatures considered in the model (mass density, thermal conductivity and specific heat) were those given in EN1993-1-2:2004 [25] and the reduction factors for the modulus of elasticity and the yield strength of steel at elevated temperatures were obtained from the annex E of EN1993-1-2:2004 [25], whereas the expansion was taken from [26].…”
Section: Materials Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stress-strain curve used in the finite element analysis (FEA) for the CFS profiles was based on tensile coupon test results and at the same time on other studies of literature [14,15,17,23], with a nominal yield strength of 320 MPa, a tensile strength of 390 MPa and a modulus of elasticity of 210 GPa. Residual stresses and cold-work of forming (where the apparent yield stress in the corners is increased) were ignored in these analyses, in other words, the mechanical properties of steel were assumed to be uniform across the crosssection, like other researchers in this field did [9,24]. The thermal properties of the CFS sections at elevated temperatures considered in the model (mass density, thermal conductivity and specific heat) were those given in EN1993-1-2:2004 [25] and the reduction factors for the modulus of elasticity and the yield strength of steel at elevated temperatures were obtained from the annex E of EN1993-1-2:2004 [25], whereas the expansion was taken from [26].…”
Section: Materials Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This arises because the local buckling slenderness (width-tothickness ratio) of the sub-elements is smaller than that of the original plate element. The shape, size and position of intermediate stiffeners significantly affects the stability of cold-formed steel members [8,9]. The intermediate stiffeners must also have adequate rigidity to prevent out-ofplane deflections in the plate element in the region of the stiffener, thus allowing that under uniform compression this area of the section becomes fully stressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding indicates that in built-up members a degree of composite action between components sections is achieved due to presence of fasteners. Zhang and Young [5] presented a modified DSM and showed that predicted design strengths are reliable and conservative for built-up open section columns. Georgieva et al [6] investigated the applicability of the DSM for design of built-up CFS through experimental studies and suggested that a similar modified design methodology based on DSM can be adopted in structural standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Wang and Young [5] studied the effect of both cross-sectional dimensions and fastener spacing on the ultimate strength of built-up box and I beams with intermediate fasteners. Later, the effect of edge and web stiffeners on the behaviour of built-up I-columns were investigated in [6] via extensive parametric studies. The FSM has been widely used for elastic buckling analysis of CFS members, but its range of application is mostly limited to single sections and simple end boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,8]. Some attempts have been made to extend the application range of conventional FSM to built-up sections via applying nodal multi-point constraints that tie any desired DOF from the adjacent plate components continuously along the length of the member [9] or through modelling fasteners as continuous longitudinal solid stiffeners [6]. However, these assumptions may not represent the actual effect of discrete fasteners and fail to accurately capture the level of composite action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%