2015
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/579/1/012008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of a high head Francis turbine under steady operating conditions using foam-extend

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation is attributed to the omission of the seal leakage losses. Often, numerical results are misleading because the torque and head are over-predicted with an inlet flow boundary condition; see Lenarcic et al [12]. Since the torque generated by the turbine and the available head are related to each other, the hydraulic efficiency is fairly well predicted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The variation is attributed to the omission of the seal leakage losses. Often, numerical results are misleading because the torque and head are over-predicted with an inlet flow boundary condition; see Lenarcic et al [12]. Since the torque generated by the turbine and the available head are related to each other, the hydraulic efficiency is fairly well predicted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results presented at the workshop, the differences in quantities, such as head, discharge, and torque were greater than the differences in hydraulic efficiency under the corresponding operating conditions compared to the experimental data. The torque and head values were over-predicted by 13.9% and 19.5% at the BEP, respectively [12]. The hydraulic efficiency showed a difference of´3.9% (see Table 4).…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the results presented in the workshop, the difference in the quantities such as head, discharge, and torque was larger than the difference in hydraulic efficiency at the corresponding operating condition compared to the experimental data. The torque and head values were over-predicted by 13.9% and 19.5% at the BEP, respectively Lenarcic [10]. The hydraulic efficiency showed a difference of À3.9%.…”
Section: Hydraulic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There are several recent studies in literature in which the interactions between runner-guide vane and runner-draft tube are included via frozen rotor interface. For example, Lenarcic et al [16] simulated incompressible turbulent flow for a high head Francis turbine under steady operating conditions which is computed using an open source code. Influences of the coupling methods are compared with each other and with experimental data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%