2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-64519-3_64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of a Model Wind Turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between the FLOWer results with and without wind tunnel walls are larger than for the flapwise bending moment ( M x ≈ 33 % compared to M y < 20 %; see Table 13). This corresponds to the results of Fischer et al (2018) and Klein et al (2018), who also experienced a stronger influence of the walls on the power than on the thrust. The reason for this phenomenon is attributed to the different sensitivity of the forces to AoA variations.…”
Section: Investigation Of the Bending Momentssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The differences between the FLOWer results with and without wind tunnel walls are larger than for the flapwise bending moment ( M x ≈ 33 % compared to M y < 20 %; see Table 13). This corresponds to the results of Fischer et al (2018) and Klein et al (2018), who also experienced a stronger influence of the walls on the power than on the thrust. The reason for this phenomenon is attributed to the different sensitivity of the forces to AoA variations.…”
Section: Investigation Of the Bending Momentssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A comparison between the QBlade results and the FLOWer results under far field conditions verifies this assumption, as both the distributions and the offsets to the measured values, see Table 10, are almost similar. More information about this phenomenon and the underlying reasons can be found in Fischer et al (2018) and Klein et al (2018). The small kinks at ≈ 90 and ≈ 270 • azimuth in the QBlade results are a result of the usage of the tower model.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Angle Of Attackmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations