2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of earthquake response reduction effects by negative stiffness connection for adjacent building structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two horizontal components of ground motions from the Imperial Valley earthquake at El Centro station in 1994 and from the California earthquake at the Pasadena station in 1952 were used, and artificial SHW2 ground motions were generated as the input waves. These ground motions were selected based on their spectral characteristics, and the fundamental period of the test model was 0.26 s. These sets of ground motions were also used by lots of studies for shaking table test [18,19]. Fig.…”
Section: Loading Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two horizontal components of ground motions from the Imperial Valley earthquake at El Centro station in 1994 and from the California earthquake at the Pasadena station in 1952 were used, and artificial SHW2 ground motions were generated as the input waves. These ground motions were selected based on their spectral characteristics, and the fundamental period of the test model was 0.26 s. These sets of ground motions were also used by lots of studies for shaking table test [18,19]. Fig.…”
Section: Loading Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chong et al [17] investigated the seismic performance of exterior wall panels with a pair of U-shaped steel plate energy absorbers, and the results demonstrated that in case of the crawler-type rolling deformation, the U-shaped steel plate energy absorber improved the energy dissipation capacity and deformation performance of the overall structure. Longjam and Shirai [18] evaluated the transfer function for displacement and acceleration of the mainframe and subframe under various structural parameters using a two-degrees-of-freedom model. The researchers found that after setting an optimal negative stiffness and damping at the connecting portion, the peak amplitude of the transfer function of the mainframe can significantly reduce as compared to the reference-controlled case without negative stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel smooth negative stiffness device is able to produce significant apparent weakening in the structure and does not require the additional damping to be added 59 . A coupled vibration control system with suitable negative stiffness can significantly reduce the peak transfer function of the primary structure compared to a vibration control system without negative stiffness 60 . In addition, negative stiffness can address the torsional effect generated in non-coaxial adjacent building structures, thus enhancing the nonlinear energy dissipation effects of the vibration isolation system 61 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the concept of introducing negative stiffness elements (or anti‐springs) for vibration control has been reported in previous studies 3–7 . It has been demonstrated in the literature that a system with negative stiffness may have a better vibration control performance if it remains stable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the concept of introducing negative stiffness elements (or anti-springs) for vibration control has been reported in previous studies. [3][4][5][6][7] It has been demonstrated in the literature that a system with negative stiffness may have a better vibration control performance if it remains stable. Moreover, the negative stiffness device in TMD-NSD, like inerter-based systems, can be viewed as an indirect technique of increasing the inertia effect of the added mass without directly increasing the mass itself.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%