2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of effectivity indices of space-time error indicators for Navier–Stokes equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first prove (28) considering E ∈ T h . Regarding the terms involving the VEM stabilization, we first point out that, as a consequence of (17), we have…”
Section: Discretization Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We first prove (28) considering E ∈ T h . Regarding the terms involving the VEM stabilization, we first point out that, as a consequence of (17), we have…”
Section: Discretization Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going back to (39), we estimate the continuity of B supg,h , given by (23), (25) and (28), and the estimate on the VEM interpolator in (37):…”
Section: A Priori Error Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other explicit methods can be considered error indicators, like [33], where the curvature or second derivative of the solution is used to adapt the mesh size of compressible flow calculations. In this line, for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equation it can be mentioned the error indicator [34]. An example for anisotropy mesh adaptation for the shallow water equations can be found in [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%