2005
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.45.1616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of Fluid Flow Phenomenon in a Curved Shape Tundish of Billet Caster

Abstract: The conventional delta shaped tundish (rectangular with sloping walls) is currently used in many industries for billet caster. The effective volume in this type of tundish is significantly low and results in a lower quality of steel. In the present work, a three-dimensional mathematical model has been used to study the fluid flow characteristics in a six strand billet caster tundish whose one side is curved. The results obtained were compared with a conventional delta shaped tundish and the strong role of curv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A numerical model was also developed in FLUENT to simulate the flow behaviour in the water model, improving the understanding of the results of the physical model experiments. The effect of the assumptions of symmetry and dynamically steady flow on numerical results, which were frequently used in tundish CFD studies to reduce the computational time (Kumar et al, 2008;Tripathi and Ajmani, 2011;Zhong et al, 2007;Mishra et al, 2012;Tripathi and Ajmani, 2005;Jha et al, 2001) was also investigated. This is of importance, as there is no information on the effects of these assumptions on computational accuracy in the available literature on tundishes.…”
Section: Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A numerical model was also developed in FLUENT to simulate the flow behaviour in the water model, improving the understanding of the results of the physical model experiments. The effect of the assumptions of symmetry and dynamically steady flow on numerical results, which were frequently used in tundish CFD studies to reduce the computational time (Kumar et al, 2008;Tripathi and Ajmani, 2011;Zhong et al, 2007;Mishra et al, 2012;Tripathi and Ajmani, 2005;Jha et al, 2001) was also investigated. This is of importance, as there is no information on the effects of these assumptions on computational accuracy in the available literature on tundishes.…”
Section: Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows a single iteration per time step to be used, instead of approximately six to eight iterations per time step, drastically reducing the required computational time. Although both of these assumptions are frequently used in tundish literature (Kumar et al, 2008;Tripathi and Ajmani, 2011;Zhong et al, 2007;Mishra et al, 2012;Tripathi and Ajmani, 2005;Jha et al, 2001), there is little information available about their effect on the numerical results. For this reason, the RTD curves were compared for three different cases: dynamically steady flow with two symmetry planes, dynamically steady flow without symmetry, and fully transient flow without symmetry.…”
Section: Symmetry Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the free surface, the shear stress boundary (zero shear stress) condition was used. [9][10][11][12][13] At the inlet, the mean vertical average velocity is assumed to be uniform in its transversal section, and it was obtained by dividing the steel flow rate into the transversal area. A value of zero was established for the other two components of velocity.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the efficiency of inclusion removal has been one of the most important criteria in evaluating the metallurgical performance of any given tundish design. Numerous studies have been conducted to optimize the designs of tundishes using various flow control devices, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] such as weirs, dams, impact pads, turbulence inhibitors, etc. In order to promote the floatation of inclusions, these devices can improve the removal of larger inclusions, greater than say 50 μm, but do not necessarily promote the removal of smaller sized inclusions, owing to their extremely low Stokesian velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%