2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0001204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of Large-Diameter Monopiles in Sands: Critical Review and Evaluation of Both API and Newly Proposed p-y Curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sorensen [15] the above-mentioned p-y curves were deemed no longer appropriate for this kind of foundations. A detailed critical review of the API method can be found in [8]. This situation prompted many researchers to suggest analytical p-y curves formulae in an attempt to improve the analysis by accounting for the monopile diameter and sometimes for monopile bending flexural rigidity.…”
Section: Silicamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sorensen [15] the above-mentioned p-y curves were deemed no longer appropriate for this kind of foundations. A detailed critical review of the API method can be found in [8]. This situation prompted many researchers to suggest analytical p-y curves formulae in an attempt to improve the analysis by accounting for the monopile diameter and sometimes for monopile bending flexural rigidity.…”
Section: Silicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as this model has been developed on the basis of field testing investigations performed on small-diameter piles (D p =0.61 m) with an (L p ⁄D p ) ratio of 34.0 [6,7], it does not appear capable of reasonably predicting the lateral response of large-diameter monopiles supporting OWTs. For an in-depth review of the drawbacks of the API p-y model, the reader is referred to [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the lateral force versus deflection (p-y) [16,17] and vertical friction versus displacement (t-z) relationships [18,19] (as illustrated in Figure 2), should be included in the analysis. [20], boundary element methods (BEMs) [21] and finite element methods (FEMs) [22,23]. Aiming to practical applications, this research adopts the efficient Line-Finite-Element (LFEM) analysis method [24], and further develops for the analysis of steel driven H-piles considering the SSI relationships, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the harsh environmental conditions and high cost, the field test of large diameter monopile is difficult to carry out, hence the numerical analysis is more commonly used. Bouzid et al [3] pointed out that the finite element method is effective for the assessment of lateral loaded monopile and the conventional p-y curve method derived from field tests of a small diameter is not suitable for large diameter monopile. Achmus et al [4] evaluated the effect of pile diameter on p-y curves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%