2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of pile installation effects in sand using material point method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the materials used in this method like bentonite intensify the looseness. These two methods of installation have different effects on interaction factor [19][20]. In these experiments, none of these conditions was exactly dominated since piles initially were set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the materials used in this method like bentonite intensify the looseness. These two methods of installation have different effects on interaction factor [19][20]. In these experiments, none of these conditions was exactly dominated since piles initially were set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to keep the fine mesh always around the plate, a moving mesh approach is applied (Beuth, 2012;Phuong et al, 2016). It consists in adjusting the mesh with the movement of the plate.…”
Section: The Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the large soil-plate displacements cannot be captured with the standard Lagrangian FEM because of issues with element distortions, Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian methods (ALE) and particle-based methods have been developed in the last few decades (Atluri & Zhu, 2000;Donea & Huerta, 2004). Among them, the remeshing and interpolation technique with small strain (RITSS) method (Hu & Randolph, 1998), the coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) method (Grabe, Qiu, & Wu, 2015;Qiu, Henke, & Grabe, 2011), and the Material Point Method (MPM) (Sulsky, Chen, & Schreyer, 1994) have been successfully applied in soil penetration problems similar to the anchor pull out discussed in this paper Mahmoodzadeh & Randolph, 2014;Phuong, van Tol, Elkadi, & Rohe, 2016;Tian, Cassidy, Randolph, Wang, & Gaudin, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3) Remap information (4) Reset grid, advance timestep This numerical method is used for a wide array of applications. In the geoengineering field, landslide analysis (Andersen & Andersen, 2010), cracks propagation (Chen & al., 2002), pile driving (Phuong & al., 2016), multi-phase soil mechanics , erosion and fluid-structure interaction (Onate & al., 2008;Parker & al., 2006) are some examples of problems that were tackled with the MPM. These developments were made possible by the fact that MPM overcomes some of the downfalls on traditional FEM analysis.…”
Section: Points Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%