2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12046-018-1041-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of single bubble dynamics in liquid sodium pool

Abstract: The single gas bubble rise dynamics in liquid sodium/sodium-potassium alloy (NaK) pool due to entrainment of argon cover gas/non-condensable fission gas (xenon) have received considerable attention in the safe operation of Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (SFR). Numerical simulation of single bubble dynamics in liquid sodium/NaK pool is an essential intermediate step for the evaluation of rise velocity and shape changes, which are of utmost importance in areas of reactor safety concerned with source term evaluation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In essence, numerical simulation cannot include all practical factors; therefore, numerical results manifest a more stable bubble state than the experimental results do. Such an inverted trapezoid bubble shape has also been reported in Pradeep and Sharma 30 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, numerical simulation cannot include all practical factors; therefore, numerical results manifest a more stable bubble state than the experimental results do. Such an inverted trapezoid bubble shape has also been reported in Pradeep and Sharma 30 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies are carried out using commercial software platforms such as Fluent, CFX. Few studies exist in the literature which use the open-source software OpenFOAM for such kind of simulations (Pradeep and Sharma, 2019). However, the OpenFOAM based studies were restricted to either 2-D or 2-D axisymmetric systems for the bubble dynamics problems studied to date (Samkhaniani et al, 2012;Raees et al, 2011, Pradeep et al, 2017, which under-predicted the bubble rise velocities and were not supported by experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%