Numerical Investigation of Tio2 and Mwcnt Turbine Meter Oil Nanofluids: Flow and Hydrodynamic Properties

Heris, Saeed Zeinali; Sarvari, Atiyeh  Aghaei; Mohammadpourfard, Mousa; Mousavi, Seyed Borhan; Estellé, Patrice

doi:10.2139/ssrn.4017217

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To assess the pressure drop, periodic measurements of the disparity between the inlet and outlet pressures of the station were conducted and recorded at the commencement and end of each run. Based on the acquired ndings (tabulated in Table 4), it can be deduced that the nano lter did not induce an excessive pressure drop, despite extra pleats and nanostructure, which stands as both advantageous and commendable [24,25].…”

Section: Pleats and Pressure Dropmentioning

confidence: 97%

A novel approach to removing pollutant particles from natural gas in town border station (TBS) using nano filters

Bagheri,

Mousavi,

Nami

et al. 2023

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a comprehensive comparative study between nano filter elements, focusing on two key aspects: pressure drop and pollutant elimination efficiency. The objective was to determine the performance superiority of nano filter elements and their potential as a viable alternative for TBS (Town Border Station). The study involved a six-month investigation, during which the filter elements were subjected to regular pressure checks, structural analysis, and particle characterization. After a standard six-month placement period, the filters underwent imaging analysis using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. The results showed significant differences between the two filter types. Nano filters demonstrated higher adsorption of aluminum, indicating improved pollutant capture attributed to the cartridge material. They also exhibited the presence of phosphorus, sulfur, and copper, elements absent in conventional filters, while conventional filters had higher carbon content. The smaller mesh size of nano filters facilitated the capture of smaller-sized pollutants. Silicon content was negligible in nano filters, which raised concerns compared to the small presence observed in conventional filters. Surprisingly, despite having 19 more pleats, the nano filters caused no significant pressure drop in the gas flow line while effectively retaining a greater quantity of particles. The obtained results shed light on the advantages of nano filter elements in terms of reduced pressure drop and enhanced pollutant removal capability.

show abstract

Section: Pleats and Pressure Dropmentioning

confidence: 97%

A novel approach to removing pollutant particles from natural gas in town border station (TBS) using nano filters

Bagheri,

Mousavi,

Nami

et al. 2023

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another sort of adsorbents, known as nano adsorbents, have also been employed due to their unique properties for water treatment objectives. Even though using nano adsorbents has many advantages, there are still some weaknesses, such as toxicity, the necessity of using a holding material to achieve a better separation process and permeability, cost, and the tendency of nanoparticles to be agglomerated [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Furthermore, nanoparticle release into the environment is another hazard that should be avoided.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arsenic removal performance of granular adsorbents using novel clinoptilolites modified with iron nanoparticles

Nami

Mousavi

Fazli-Shokouhi

et al. 2022

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this research, novel beads were successfully synthesized from natural clinoptilolite (CL) modified with iron nanoparticles (FCL). Beads were prepared using alginate (A) and chitosan (C). FESEM, EDX, XRD, and FTIR techniques were employed to characterize the CL, FCL, A-bead, and C-bead. A comprehensive series of batch adsorption experiments were conducted utilizing both prepared samples to study the influential parameters. The most effective cross-linking solutions of chitosan and alginate were sodium tripolyphosphate/sodium hydroxide and 4% Ferric chloride, respectively. The optimum ratio of chitosan/FCL and alginate/FCL was 1:3 and 1:4, sequentially. The effect of initial arsenic concentration, and adsorbent concentration were evaluated. The optimal removal rate of 86% and 93.27% were found for A-beads and C-beads using their optimized initial concentration. Moreover, the best arsenic removal performance was seen 1 g/L for both A-beads and C-beads. The removal rate of 0.3, 0.6, 1, 1.5, and 2 g/L of alginate was 75.12%, 81.15%, 82.21%, 82.90%, and 83.15%, respectively. On the other hand, C-beads had higher removal rates at the considered contents. The removal rate of 0.3, 0.6, 1, 1.5, and 2 g/L of C-beads were 75.18%, 88.78%, 91.86%, 92.25%, and 92.4%, respectively. Additionally, Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms were employed to find the maximum adsorption capacity. The maximum adsorption capacity of qmax of alginate and chitosan beads was 10000 𝜇g/g.

show abstract

Arsenic Removal Performance of Granular Adsorbents Using Novel Clinoptilolites Modified with Iron Nanoparticles

Nami¹,

Mousavi²,

Fazli-Shokouhi³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this research, novel beads were successfully synthesized from natural clinoptilolite (CL) modified with iron nanoparticles (FCL). Beads were prepared using alginate (A) and chitosan (C). FESEM, EDX, XRD, and FTIR techniques were employed to characterize the CL, FCL, A-bead, and C-bead. A comprehensive series of batch adsorption experiments were conducted utilizing both prepared samples to study the influential parameters. The most effective cross-linking solutions of chitosan and alginate were sodium tripolyphosphate/sodium hydroxide and 4% Ferric chloride, respectively. The optimum ratio of chitosan/FCL and alginate/FCL was 1:3 and 1:4, sequentially. The effect of initial arsenic concentration, and adsorbent concentration were evaluated. The optimal removal rate of 86% and 93.27% were found for A-beads and C-beads using their optimized initial concentration. Moreover, the best arsenic removal performance was seen 1 g/L for both A-beads and C-beads. The removal rate of 0.3, 0.6, 1, 1.5, and 2 g/L of alginate was 75.12%, 81.15%, 82.21%, 82.90%, and 83.15%, respectively. On the other hand, C-beads had higher removal rates at the considered contents. The removal rate of 0.3, 0.6, 1, 1.5, and 2 g/L of C-beads were 75.18%, 88.78%, 91.86%, 92.25%, and 92.4%, respectively. Additionally, Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms were employed to find the maximum adsorption capacity. The maximum adsorption capacity of q_max of alginate and chitosan beads was 10000 ?g/g.

show abstract

Numerical Investigation of Tio2 and Mwcnt Turbine Meter Oil Nanofluids: Flow and Hydrodynamic Properties

Cited by 3 publications

References 34 publications

A novel approach to removing pollutant particles from natural gas in town border station (TBS) using nano filters

A novel approach to removing pollutant particles from natural gas in town border station (TBS) using nano filters

Arsenic removal performance of granular adsorbents using novel clinoptilolites modified with iron nanoparticles

Arsenic Removal Performance of Granular Adsorbents Using Novel Clinoptilolites Modified with Iron Nanoparticles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About