2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11052257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of Tonal Trailing-Edge Noise Radiated by Low Reynolds Number Airfoils

Abstract: A high-fidelity computational analysis carefully validated against concurrently obtained experimental results is employed to examine self-noise radiation of airfoils at transitional flow regimes, with a focus on elucidating the connection between the unsteady behavior of the laminar separation bubble (LSB) and the acoustic feedback-loop (AFL) resonant interactions observed in the airfoil boundary layers. The employed parametric study examines AFL sensitivity to the changes in the upstream flow conditions and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tonal noise emission has been extensively reported for flow conditions with the chord-based Reynolds number 5 × 10 4 < Re < 2 × 10 6 and the angle of attack |α| < 10 • on symmetric aerofoils, e.g. NACA 0006, NACA 0008 (Sandberg et al 2009), NACA 0012 (Paterson et al 1973;Desquesnes et al 2007;Jones & Sandberg 2011;Stalnov, Chaitanya & Joseph 2016;Golubev 2021;Nguyen et al 2021) and NACA 0018 (Paterson et al 1973;Nakano, Fujisawa & Lee 2006). Cambered aerofoils designed for small wind turbines and fan blades were also reported to generate tonal noise in the Reynolds number range of 5 × 10 4 -6 × 10 5 and light loading conditions (Longhouse 1977;Oerlemans 2003;Wang et al 2009;Sanjose et al 2019;Yakhina et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tonal noise emission has been extensively reported for flow conditions with the chord-based Reynolds number 5 × 10 4 < Re < 2 × 10 6 and the angle of attack |α| < 10 • on symmetric aerofoils, e.g. NACA 0006, NACA 0008 (Sandberg et al 2009), NACA 0012 (Paterson et al 1973;Desquesnes et al 2007;Jones & Sandberg 2011;Stalnov, Chaitanya & Joseph 2016;Golubev 2021;Nguyen et al 2021) and NACA 0018 (Paterson et al 1973;Nakano, Fujisawa & Lee 2006). Cambered aerofoils designed for small wind turbines and fan blades were also reported to generate tonal noise in the Reynolds number range of 5 × 10 4 -6 × 10 5 and light loading conditions (Longhouse 1977;Oerlemans 2003;Wang et al 2009;Sanjose et al 2019;Yakhina et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2015; Stalnov, Chaitanya & Joseph 2016; Golubev 2021; Nguyen et al. 2021) and NACA 0018 (Paterson et al. 1973; Nakano, Fujisawa & Lee 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulations provided valuable insights on the noise sources but could not account for intrinsic threedimensional (3D) effects, such as vortex stretching and transition to turbulence. To over-come this limitation, 3D simulations have been recently employed to investigate such effects in the context of airfoil secondary tones and the feedback loop mechanisms [9,10,[12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other TE noise sources exist, such as the vortex shedding entailed by a blunted trailing edge (which also generates a strong tonal, dipolar acoustic emission), or the flow separation occurring in the early stage of stall (as opposed to the deep stall one, which rather results in noise radiating from the entire airfoil). Given its multiple components and complex physics, the airfoil trailing edge (TE) noise is still only partly understood [1][2][3], despite half a century of investigations using either experimental [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], theoretical [15][16][17][18][19], or computational [20][21][22][23][24][25] means.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last but not least, open jets are likely to alter the far-field noise radiation, due to both acoustic refraction (by the jet shear layers [28]) and acoustic diffusion (by the jet fine scale turbulence). Although these effects can be corrected a posteriori through analytical and/or semi-empirical means [29][30][31][32][33], such corrections imply some restrictive assumptions that make them partly conclusive only [25] (e.g., the plug flow model by Amiet [29,30]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%