35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-3244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Investigation of Unsteady Blowing Through Discrete Slots on a Swept Vertical Tail of Infinite Span

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…values. This is something which has already been observed by Gebhardt [32] who concluded that pulsed blowing is more effective than steady blowing for low C μ values and the opposite conclusion for high C μ values. One can also observe that the higher the freestream velocity, the (slightly) higher the lift increment with sweeping jets.…”
Section: Comparison Between Continuous/pulsed Blowing Segmented Slotsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…values. This is something which has already been observed by Gebhardt [32] who concluded that pulsed blowing is more effective than steady blowing for low C μ values and the opposite conclusion for high C μ values. One can also observe that the higher the freestream velocity, the (slightly) higher the lift increment with sweeping jets.…”
Section: Comparison Between Continuous/pulsed Blowing Segmented Slotsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Before testing the sweeping jets in the next section, the effect of a segmented slot which will create 3D effects on the flow (contrary to the two previous sections where the effect of the control was mostly 2D) has been investigated like in Gebhart [32]. Since the sweeping jets will blow through isolated slots with a spanwise spacing of several percent of the span, the idea was to investigate the effect of this segmentation of the blowing alone without the additional sweeping effect.…”
Section: Segmented Slotmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation