2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12648-021-02132-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation of ZnO–MWCNTs/ethylene glycol hybrid nanofluid flow with activation energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Viscous dissipation and elastic deformation effects are incorporated in the temperature equation. Following [22,24,25,37], the activation energy is analyzed. The present nanofluid flow geometry is illustrated in figure 1.…”
Section: Formulation Of Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Viscous dissipation and elastic deformation effects are incorporated in the temperature equation. Following [22,24,25,37], the activation energy is analyzed. The present nanofluid flow geometry is illustrated in figure 1.…”
Section: Formulation Of Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show an increase in entropy generation with higher values of Reynolds and Brinkman numbers. Prashar and Ojjela [25] have considered activation energy and Joulian dissipation influence on second-grade ZnO − MWCNT/EG hybrid nanofluid flow. The investigation of bioconvection and activation energy impact on mixed convective flow of Carreau fluid past a stretching sheet was performed by Rehman et al [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this, the effective density ρhnf${\rho _{hnf}}$, viscosity μhnf${\mu _{hnf}}$, and heat capacity (ρCp)hnf${(\rho {C_p})_{hnf}}$ [27, 38, 49, 50] of the TiO 2 –MWCNTs/EG–water hybrid nanofluid are computed similarly by the Equations ()–(). μhnfbadbreak=11ϕ12.51ϕ22.5μf,$$\begin{equation}{\mu _{hnf}} = \frac{1}{{{{\left( {1 - {\phi _1}} \right)}^{2.5}}{{\left( {1 - {\phi _2}} \right)}^{2.5}}}}{\mu _f},\end{equation}$$ ρhnfbadbreak={}()1ϕ2()()1ϕ1+ϕ1ρsρf+ϕ2ρCNTρfρf,0.16em0.16em0.16em$$\begin{equation}{\rho _{hnf}} = \left\{ {\left( {1 - {\phi _2}} \right)\left( {\left( {1 - {\phi _1}} \right) + {\phi _1}\frac{{{\rho _s}}}{{{\rho _f}}}} \right) + {\phi _2}\frac{{{\rho _{\rm CNT}}}}{{{\rho _f}}}} \right\}{\rho _f},\,\,\,\end{equation}$$ ρCphnf0.16embadbreak={}()1ϕ2()()1ϕ1+ϕ1()ρCps()ρCpf...…”
Section: Mathematical Modeling and Flow Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this, the system of equations given in Equation () subject to the initial conditions () is integrated by the Runge–Kutta method till η${\eta _\infty }$. The numerical results obtained by integration at η${\eta _\infty }$ are compared to the actual values given by the boundary conditions at η${\eta _\infty }$ which is done by the Newton‐Raphson method [27, 38, 53, 54]. The MATLAB code developed for the numerical solution is validated against the results published by Soid et al.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation