2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2022.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation on the water entry of a 3D circular cylinder based on a GPU-accelerated SPH method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, both the wedge and the semi‐cylinder are placed on the centerline, just above the free surface. Similar water entry cases were reported by experiments and simulations, 6,64–68 where fluid–structure interaction is considered. However, the FSI analysis is out of the scope of this article, and will be further discussed in future works.…”
Section: Numerical Examplessupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, both the wedge and the semi‐cylinder are placed on the centerline, just above the free surface. Similar water entry cases were reported by experiments and simulations, 6,64–68 where fluid–structure interaction is considered. However, the FSI analysis is out of the scope of this article, and will be further discussed in future works.…”
Section: Numerical Examplessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…When the rigid bodies impact the free surface, some free surface nodes are defined as slip boundary nodes by the prediction algorithm. As the entry develops, the fluid domain under the incompressible constraint is driven by the rigid bodies and moves toward left and right, producing splashes, producing reasonable fluid movement that is similar to References 64, 67. The pressure contours are smooth from the moving rigid bodies to the fixed water tank boundary, showing good stabilization properties of the proposed SNS‐PFEM‐FIC algorithm.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It has some advantages, such as easy implementation, high parallelism, and effective treatment of complicated geometries. As for the mesh-free particle methods, e.g., the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) [12][13][14][15][16] and the moving particle semi-implicit/simulation (MPS) method [17][18][19], the strong capability in solving fluid flows with free surfaces and large displacements has been well documented. However, this approach cannot simulate structural deformation and stress distribution well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e finite particle method (FPM) proposed by Liu et al [27,28] is a modified SPH scheme with better accuracy [28]. In recent years, the SPH and FPM scheme have been applied to solving different coastal engineering problems, such as wave breaking and overtopping [29][30][31][32][33][34][35], fluid-structure interactions [36][37][38][39][40], and porous media [41][42][43][44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%