2023
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad00fa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigation reveals challenges in measuring the contrast recovery coefficients in PET

Reimund Bayerlein,
Benjamin A Spencer,
Yasser G Abdelhafez
et al.

Abstract: Objective. Contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) is essential for image quality (IQ) assessment in positron emission tomography (PET), typically measured according to the NEMA NU 2 standard. This study quantifies systematic uncertainties of the CRC measurement by a numerical investigation of the effects from scanner-independent parameters like voxel size, region-of-interest (ROI) misplacement, and sphere position on the underlying image grid. 

Approach. CRC measurements with 2D and 3D ROIs were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative differences between the scatter corrected images of the individual IQ phantoms were observed, which are most likely explained by image noise, and phantom position. Axial position impacts the sensitivity and therefore the noise level and contrast in the image, while the transverse position can impact the obtained CRC (Bayerlein et al 2023). Since no PSF modeling was applied, the occurrence of an amplifying Gibbs-like phenomenon can be ruled out as an explanation of higher CRC obtained for the smallest three spheres of the first phantom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative differences between the scatter corrected images of the individual IQ phantoms were observed, which are most likely explained by image noise, and phantom position. Axial position impacts the sensitivity and therefore the noise level and contrast in the image, while the transverse position can impact the obtained CRC (Bayerlein et al 2023). Since no PSF modeling was applied, the occurrence of an amplifying Gibbs-like phenomenon can be ruled out as an explanation of higher CRC obtained for the smallest three spheres of the first phantom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%