2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2012.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical investigations on the VFE-2 65-degree rounded leading edge delta wing using the unstructured DLR TAU-Code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several publications [17,21,35] of the author are used for the validation of the numerical method and grid generation approach and provide the validation for the RANS solver DLR TAU to justify the present numerical approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several publications [17,21,35] of the author are used for the validation of the numerical method and grid generation approach and provide the validation for the RANS solver DLR TAU to justify the present numerical approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A summary of all numerical results is given by Fritz and Cummings [16]. A summary of the numerical results using the CFD method TAU are given in Schütte and Lüdeke [17]. The results of the VFE-2 provide a first understanding of the complex vortical flow around a delta wing with round leading edges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The grid topology and parameters are taken from a best practice approach at DLR applied on several configurations like VFE-2 delta wing, X-31 configuration and the generic UCAV SACCON. 13,14,15 The surface of Grid I is resolved using a quadrilateral mesh, whereas the surface of Grid II is resolved using triangular elements. The near wall layer of Grid I, in which the boundary layer is present, is resolved by 30 layers using hexahedral elements.…”
Section: B Computational Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement between the numerical results and the experimental data is mildly good, considering the quite coarse mesh and the simple turbulent model used. Note also that capturing the correct position of the vortices separation and reattachment points is quite challenging for this test case, as observed in other numerical simulations [36].…”
Section: Nasa Delta Wingmentioning
confidence: 55%