2020
DOI: 10.1109/jmmct.2020.2983336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Methods for Electromagnetic Modeling of Graphene: A Review

Abstract: Graphene's remarkable electrical, mechanical, thermal, and chemical properties have made this frontier of many other two-dimensional materials a focus of significant research interest in the last decade. Many theoretical studies of the physical mechanisms behind these properties have been followed by those investing the graphene's practical use in various fields of engineering. Electromagnetics, optics, and photonics are among these fields, where potential benefits of graphene in improving device/system perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coating of antenna at the sub‐MMW band shows better performance improvement that due to the skin effect, where the current is mainly concentrated on the surface of conducting layer. The skin depth is inversely proportional with frequency, where at high frequencies, most of the current are concentrated in the top layer (coated layer), which has a better conductivity compared to the inner (copper) layer in this frequency band 38,39 . The difference between directivity and realized gain is caused by the loss of dissipated power in the parts of antenna elements (patch, ground, feedline and substrate), where the metal loss represents a main part of it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coating of antenna at the sub‐MMW band shows better performance improvement that due to the skin effect, where the current is mainly concentrated on the surface of conducting layer. The skin depth is inversely proportional with frequency, where at high frequencies, most of the current are concentrated in the top layer (coated layer), which has a better conductivity compared to the inner (copper) layer in this frequency band 38,39 . The difference between directivity and realized gain is caused by the loss of dissipated power in the parts of antenna elements (patch, ground, feedline and substrate), where the metal loss represents a main part of it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that the graphene sheet is located on an interface between two subdomains. Then, RTCs in (2) are modified to account for RBCs in (1). This modification yields RRTCs that are expressed as In the each subdomain, RTCs (2) and RRTCs (3) are used to "connect" the electric and magnetic field SIEs that are used as the subdomain's governing equations [7], [8].…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To efficiently simulate electromagnetic field interactions on these devices and systems, often the graphene sheet is modeled as an infinitesimally thin surface and resistive boundary conditions (RBCs) are enforced this surface to relate the electromagnetic fields on its two sides [2]. Indeed, this approach has been successfully incorporated within finite-difference time-domain method [3] and discontinuous Galerkin time-domain scheme [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), only the intra-band contribution can be considered, so the surface conductivity can be approximately expressed as [18], [20], [21]:…”
Section: Characteristics Of Graphene Reconfigurable Reflectarray Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%