1989
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9142-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Methods for Grid Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
190
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
190
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although A is not a diagonal dominant matrix, which is a classical requirement, see [16,17], for the correctness and stability of the Thomas method, we can prove the following statement.…”
Section: M+2mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although A is not a diagonal dominant matrix, which is a classical requirement, see [16,17], for the correctness and stability of the Thomas method, we can prove the following statement.…”
Section: M+2mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For linear FEM solution, the details are given in [13]. For quadratic FEM, using (4.3)-(4.6), just as in the classical theory, [16,17] and applying the full induction method, we can prove the inequalities…”
Section: M+2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case if the size of the system (2.1) is too large to solve it by direct methods one should use iterative methods (see [9]). Then the gain of the parametric extrapolation in computational amount is great.…”
Section: 12)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After finding EVs, the EF corresponding to s+1 λ m is calculated by inverse iteration method [7,9,25]. Then the obtained EF is used for constructing a new matrix s+1 Λ on the following iterative step.…”
Section: Eigenfunction Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%