1996
DOI: 10.3133/ofr95470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical model analysis of the effects of ground-water withdrawals on discharge to streams and springs in small basins typical of the Puget Sound Lowland, Washington

Abstract: Introduction 1 Background 1 Purpose and scope Description of the Puget Sound Lowland Method of study Acknowledgments Hydrogeologic characteristics of typical small basins in the Puget Sound Lowland Topography Hydrogeologic layers Groundwater recharge 11 Groundwater movement and discharge Horizontal movement Vertical movement Discharge 13 Source of water to wells Description of the numerical model Approach General features of the numerical model Boundaries Hydraulic characteristics Horizontal hydraulic conducti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Fraser aquifer is unconfined to semi-confined glacial outwash, which is the target aquifer for municipal, domestic, and agricultural use. The Puget aquifer underlies the Fraser, and is found at depths greater than 45 m [66]. Due to the prolific nature of the Fraser aquifer, the Puget aquifer is not heavily utilized as a groundwater source.…”
Section: Assessment Of Principal Aquifers In Washingtonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fraser aquifer is unconfined to semi-confined glacial outwash, which is the target aquifer for municipal, domestic, and agricultural use. The Puget aquifer underlies the Fraser, and is found at depths greater than 45 m [66]. Due to the prolific nature of the Fraser aquifer, the Puget aquifer is not heavily utilized as a groundwater source.…”
Section: Assessment Of Principal Aquifers In Washingtonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on the ratio of horizontal to vertical hydraulic conductivity is limited. Some studies estimate an anisotropy ratio of approximately 10 in the coarse-grained aquifers, such as Qva (Morgan and Jones, 1996). Our initial-case simulation used isotropic conductivities, and we examined the effect of anisotropic conductivity in the upper aquifer in our sensitivity analyses.…”
Section: Hydraulic Conductivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate the effect of ground-water seepage from the bluff, we used the MODFLOW-2000 drain package. This package is designed to simulate the effect of features similar to an agricultural drain (McDonald and Harbaugh, 1988) and is commonly used to simulate seepage faces in regional groundwater flow models (Sapik and others, 1988;Anderson and Woessner, 1992;Morgan and Jones, 1996;Fabritz and others, 1998;Vaccaro and others, 1998). Drain cells have the effect of removing water from the aquifer at a rate proportional to the difference between the head in the aquifer and the elevation of the drain.…”
Section: Simulation Of Seepage Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of these values, large precipitation events in the Little Androscoggin River Basin are capable of infiltrating and the permeability of the till would not be a factor leading to overland flow and thus a loss of recharge to the aquifer. Morgan and Jones (1995) conducted a study of the effects of ground-water withdrawals on discharge to streams and springs in small basins typical of the Puget Sound Lowland in Washington State. In their study, reference is made to a written communication (1993) with J.J. Vaccaro (U.S. Geological Survey) in which permeameter measurements of hydraulic conductivity were made in till and showed a range from 0.0002 to…”
Section: Uncertainties In Determining Ground-water Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccaro estimated that the average annual recharge in areas underlain by till and other finegrained deposits was 17.5 in. In the simulation used in Morgan and Jones (1995), a mean annual precipitation of 44 in/yr and a recharge rate of 18 in/yr were used in the areas where the less permeable till was exposed. This recharge rate is similar to the 18.3 in.…”
Section: Ground-water-recharge Regression Equations 23mentioning
confidence: 99%