2018
DOI: 10.2112/si85-092.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Model of Geochronological Tracers for Deposition and Reworking Applied to the Mississippi Subaqueous Delta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although conserving sediment mass among a fixed number of layers is straightforward, it has proven difficult to devise a robust and efficient method that records relevant stratigraphic events in a modeled sediment bed over the wide range of conditions that occur in coastal domains. For both sediment transport and sediment bed geochemistry (i.e., Moriarty et al, 2017;Birchler et al, 2018), it can be important for the sediment bed model to achieve its highest vertical resolution near the sediment-water interface, but the original ROMS sediment bed model did not meet that goal when the sediment bed was subject to frequent or repeated cycles of erosion. The modifications we have made to the bed-layer management have improved the fidelity with which we can record stratigraphic events in the model layers, particularly at the sediment-water interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although conserving sediment mass among a fixed number of layers is straightforward, it has proven difficult to devise a robust and efficient method that records relevant stratigraphic events in a modeled sediment bed over the wide range of conditions that occur in coastal domains. For both sediment transport and sediment bed geochemistry (i.e., Moriarty et al, 2017;Birchler et al, 2018), it can be important for the sediment bed model to achieve its highest vertical resolution near the sediment-water interface, but the original ROMS sediment bed model did not meet that goal when the sediment bed was subject to frequent or repeated cycles of erosion. The modifications we have made to the bed-layer management have improved the fidelity with which we can record stratigraphic events in the model layers, particularly at the sediment-water interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, for problems of sediment geochemistry, it is important to account for the mixing of both particulate matter and porewater. Expansion of the ROMS sediment bed model to include diffusive mixing facilitates its use for interdisciplinary problems (i.e., Moriarty et al, 2017;Birchler et al, 2018). The choice of appropriate mixing parameters remains a challenge, especially when considering the spatial and seasonal heterogeneity of biological activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to idealized studies such as reported here, the geochronological model should provide useful insight if applied to realistic field settings. For example, we have used a similar one-dimensional (vertical) version of the model to represent a site offshore of the Mississippi subaqueous delta [50]. This model was implemented to replicate observed radioisotopic profiles [6].…”
Section: Future Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model-produced radioisotopic profiles were then used within various analytical models from the literature to derive deposition rate, etc., from the simulated profiles; which were then compared to the actual model deposition rates. Results showed that the analytical model estimates can be unreliable if assumptions regarding the biodiffusion rate and radioisotope activity of freshly deposited sediment are incorrect [50].…”
Section: Future Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%