2023
DOI: 10.3390/civileng4020028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modeling and Analysis of Strengthened Steel–Concrete Composite Beams in Sagging and Hogging Moment Regions

Abstract: Strengthening of composite beams is highly needed to upgrade the capacities of existing beams. The strengthening methods can be classified as active or passive techniques. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to provide detailed FE simulations for strengthened and unstrengthened steel–concrete composite beams at the sagging and hogging moment regions with and without profiled steel sheeting. The developed models were verified against experimental results from the literature. The verified models were us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An appropriate mesh size was selected to ensure accurate results. The static Riks method was followed to analyze the model [8,13,[16][17][18]. The Riks method is a powerful tool for predicting the buckling behavior of structures, as it accounts for large deformations and nonlinear material behavior.…”
Section: A Steel Beam Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An appropriate mesh size was selected to ensure accurate results. The static Riks method was followed to analyze the model [8,13,[16][17][18]. The Riks method is a powerful tool for predicting the buckling behavior of structures, as it accounts for large deformations and nonlinear material behavior.…”
Section: A Steel Beam Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prestress strands were adopted on steel beams with different expanding web ratios and 48% opening ratio as shown in Figures 12-14. Accordingly, the first numerical type (B1 NUM) has a smaller opening width (80 mm) and a higher hole number (18) and the second numerical type (B2 NUM) has a larger opening width (16 0mm) and a smaller hole number (9).…”
Section: B Second Casementioning
confidence: 99%