2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10652-014-9372-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of $$30^{\circ }$$ 30 ∘ and $$45{^\circ }$$ 45 ∘ inclined dense turbulent jets in stationary ambient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. [24] found that of the turbulence models tested in their study, the realizable k-ε and LRR models were more accurate than the other three tested. Tables 2 and 3 (after [24]) summarize the results for these two models (only presented 30 • jets for the sake of brevity).…”
Section: Discharge Through Inclined Dense Jetsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ref. [24] found that of the turbulence models tested in their study, the realizable k-ε and LRR models were more accurate than the other three tested. Tables 2 and 3 (after [24]) summarize the results for these two models (only presented 30 • jets for the sake of brevity).…”
Section: Discharge Through Inclined Dense Jetsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Ref. [24] used OpenFOAM to explore the numerical modeling of 30 • and 45 • inclined dense jets in calm ambient water conditions. OpenFOAM has a solid structure of various solvers, including a wide range of turbulence models that could be used to the jet mixing and dispersion analysis.…”
Section: Discharge Through Inclined Dense Jetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As indicated by Figure 2a, the entire domain can be subdivided into 12 segments by the planes of symmetry. To save computational costs, the present simulations only considered the first segment S1, utilized the symmetric boundary condition [8,33] for the planes of symmetry, and employed the "reflect" and "mirror" functions available in ParaView and Tecplot to mirror the results. Preparatory tests indicated that the differences between the present results and those obtained by simulations with the entire domain covered were negligible.…”
Section: Mesh Configurations and Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%