2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2018.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of soil compaction in a sugarcane crop using the finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in soil bulk density, water content at the field capacity and soil texture and structure may affected these soil physical functionalities. Furthermore, loss of soil structure and changes in soil texture due to intensive tillage for sugarcane monoculture systems and successive mechanized harvesting with heavy machinery (Silva et al 2018;Cavalcanti et al 2019) during long crop growth cycle seems to have induced consequent changes in pore architecture, soil particle size distribution which caused changes in soil water retention and negatively impacted field capacity.…”
Section: Effects Of Long-term Sugarcane Monoculture On Some Soil Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in soil bulk density, water content at the field capacity and soil texture and structure may affected these soil physical functionalities. Furthermore, loss of soil structure and changes in soil texture due to intensive tillage for sugarcane monoculture systems and successive mechanized harvesting with heavy machinery (Silva et al 2018;Cavalcanti et al 2019) during long crop growth cycle seems to have induced consequent changes in pore architecture, soil particle size distribution which caused changes in soil water retention and negatively impacted field capacity.…”
Section: Effects Of Long-term Sugarcane Monoculture On Some Soil Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good approximation of the numerical results to those obtained in the experimental tests was also found in the study of Silva et al [28], with mean relative errors lower than 5%. Silva et al [36] made comparison of the simulation and experimental void ratio-log vertical effective stress curves of the oedometric tests on compacted soil for water contents of 10%, 15% and 20%.…”
Section: Figure 3 Time-compression Behavior Of the Stabilized Peat Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When conducting the research, two factors were changed: the speed of the movement and the angular speed of rotation of the cleaning tool. The tensometric tests were conducted in each mode of operation in five replications in accordance with the adopted methodology [10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Fig 2 General View Of Experimental Installation Under Fielmentioning
confidence: 99%