2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modeling of Submerged Hydraulic Jump from a Sluice Gate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
12

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that considerable scattered points are shown in this figure due to the low accuracy of PIV in the wall-normal direction as described by Law and Herlian [11]. To further compare the present observations with analytical and previous results, a quantitative evaluation method with mean absolute relative error (MARE [35]) was used in the present study. The MARE is written as:…”
Section: Mean Velocity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It should be noted that considerable scattered points are shown in this figure due to the low accuracy of PIV in the wall-normal direction as described by Law and Herlian [11]. To further compare the present observations with analytical and previous results, a quantitative evaluation method with mean absolute relative error (MARE [35]) was used in the present study. The MARE is written as:…”
Section: Mean Velocity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Table 3 shows the result of middle point (x,y,z)=(10.5, 31,1127) in the upstream section of Y=31m and Table 4 shows all the results in all the three sections. It can be noticed that the maximum GCI value among all the points ranges from 0.66% to 1.41% and stays within 2%, which is very acceptable for numerical verification of computed results [20,30]. Therefore, it can be decided that the grid-independent solution has been achieved and there is no need for further refinement for grid size.…”
Section: Grid Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Usually, all the above mentioned turbulence models are quite accurate and valid only to fully turbulent flows. But near the wall, the flow is almost laminar and the turbulent stress hardly works, especially for the viscous sublayer region [20,21]. The traditional turbulence models do not work well here.…”
Section: Initial Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations