1996
DOI: 10.1051/jp4:1996632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modeling of the Ductile-Brittle Transition

Abstract: Abstract. Numerical studies of the ductile-brittle transition are described that are based on incorporating physically based models of the competing fracture mechanisms into the material's constitutive relation. An elastic-viscoplastic constitutive relation for a porous plastic solid is used to model ductile fracture by the nucleation and subsequent growth of voids to coalescence. Cleavage is modeled in terms of attaining a temperature and strain rate independent critical value of the maximum principal stress … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…high-strength steels). Many attempts to model the near-tip region have been empirical in nature, assuming either cohesive-zone type models in which different criteria are used to artificially "bond" the crack faces immediately behind the crack tip (Falk et al 2001;Klein et al 2001;Lobkovsky and Langer 1998;Miller et al 1999;Siegmund et al 1997), criteria for material softening in the near vicinity of the tip (Bazant and Novak 2000;Bouchbinder et al 2006;Buehler et al 2003;Buehler and Gao 2006;Gao 1996;Gumbsch and Gao 1999;Lu and Ravi-Chandar 1999), void nucleation and damage surrounding the crack tip (Afek et al 2005;Bouchbinder et al 2004;Lu et al 2005;Needleman and Tvergaard 2000;Pardoen and Hutchinson 2000;RaviChandar and Yang 1997), or a "damage" type order parameter in phase-field models of fracture (Aranson et al 2000;Hakim and Karma 2005;Henry and Levine 2004;Karma et al 2001;Karma and Lobkovsky 2004;Spatschek et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…high-strength steels). Many attempts to model the near-tip region have been empirical in nature, assuming either cohesive-zone type models in which different criteria are used to artificially "bond" the crack faces immediately behind the crack tip (Falk et al 2001;Klein et al 2001;Lobkovsky and Langer 1998;Miller et al 1999;Siegmund et al 1997), criteria for material softening in the near vicinity of the tip (Bazant and Novak 2000;Bouchbinder et al 2006;Buehler et al 2003;Buehler and Gao 2006;Gao 1996;Gumbsch and Gao 1999;Lu and Ravi-Chandar 1999), void nucleation and damage surrounding the crack tip (Afek et al 2005;Bouchbinder et al 2004;Lu et al 2005;Needleman and Tvergaard 2000;Pardoen and Hutchinson 2000;RaviChandar and Yang 1997), or a "damage" type order parameter in phase-field models of fracture (Aranson et al 2000;Hakim and Karma 2005;Henry and Levine 2004;Karma et al 2001;Karma and Lobkovsky 2004;Spatschek et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Needleman and Tvergaard (2000) used numerical modelling to demonstrate that brittle fracturing can occur within a ductile zone because of high strain rates. A likely reason for straining beneath Upptyppingar is the injection of a magma, as implied by geodetic results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the authors' knowledge the first models of this type were presented by Tvergaard, Needleman and co-workers [36,21,37,5,22]. These authors modeled the whole domain by the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model (GTN-model) with the microstructure represented by finite regions of nucleable porosity (''islands'').…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%