2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13202-019-00790-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling on drilling fluid and cutter design effect on drilling bit cutter thermal wear and breakdown

Abstract: The unconventional reservoir geological complexity will reduce the drilling bit performance. The drill bit poor performance was the reduction in rate of penetration (ROP) due to bit balling and worn cutter and downhole vibrations that led to polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) cutter to break prematurely. These poor performances were caused by drilling the transitional formations (interbedded formations) that could create huge imbalance of forces, causing downhole vibration which led to PDC cutter breakage a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed that the axe cutters have better drilling ability in hard formations and are suitable for the front row of the cutter blade of the PDC bit, while the angled cutters are more suitable for auxiliary rock breaking and should be installed in the back row of the cutter blade of the PDC bit. Conical PDC cutters are mostly used for auxiliary rock breaking in PDC bits [10,11]. Li et al [12] used the finite element method to numerically simulate the rock-breaking process of conventional PDC cutters, conical PDC cutters, and the overall rock-breaking process of the drill bit, and the results of the study showed that the conical cutters as auxiliary cutting structures could well produce pre-breaking of rocks at 100 MPa compressive strength, thus improving the overall drilling ability of the bit in hard rocks, while this approach was not effective for rocks with 50 MPa compressive strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that the axe cutters have better drilling ability in hard formations and are suitable for the front row of the cutter blade of the PDC bit, while the angled cutters are more suitable for auxiliary rock breaking and should be installed in the back row of the cutter blade of the PDC bit. Conical PDC cutters are mostly used for auxiliary rock breaking in PDC bits [10,11]. Li et al [12] used the finite element method to numerically simulate the rock-breaking process of conventional PDC cutters, conical PDC cutters, and the overall rock-breaking process of the drill bit, and the results of the study showed that the conical cutters as auxiliary cutting structures could well produce pre-breaking of rocks at 100 MPa compressive strength, thus improving the overall drilling ability of the bit in hard rocks, while this approach was not effective for rocks with 50 MPa compressive strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roller cone drill bit (RCDB) [3], which is being investigated in this study, crushes the floor of the formation bed with exerted weights from the drill bit, rotation of the drill pipe, and the jet impact force of fluids from the drill bit nozzles. Noticeably, there is a considerable amount of heat generated from RCDB cutters during rock interactions in the formation [4,5]. The continuous thermal cooling and friction effect add an economic cost to the design and replacement of drill bits; for this reason, engineering synthetic-based muds (SBM) for this study as proposed by Van Ort [6] helps to prevent accelerated wear of the drilling bit and effectively transports solid formation particles to the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, MA's model elaborates that the C t at certain instances decreased slightly with seven nozzles as compared to a five-nozzle PDC drill bit. Further, a finite element modelling to investigate the thermal-mechanical wear of (PDC) drill bit in the wellbore and its influence on rate of penetration (ROP) was conducted by earlier researchers [5]. Their redesign of drill bit hydraulics and cutters resulted that chamfered geometric cutter was better with synthetic-based muds (SBM) while stinger designed cutter was also better with oil-based muds (OBM) as demonstrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%