Two pressure-correction algorithms are studied and compared to an approximate Godunov scheme on unsteady compressible cases. The first pressure-correction algorithm sequentially solves the equations for momentum, mass and enthalpy, with sub-iterations which ensure conservativity. The algorithm also conserves the total enthalpy along a streamline, in a steady flow. The second pressure-correction algorithm sequentially solves the equations for mass, momentum and energy without sub-iteration. This scheme is conservative and ensures the discrete positivity of the density. Total enthalpy is conserved along a streamline, in a steady flow. It is numerically verified that both pressure-correction algorithms converge towards the exact solution of Riemann problems, including shock waves, rarefaction waves and contact discontinuities. To achieve this, conservativity is compulsory. The two pressure-correction algorithms and the approximate Godunov scheme are finally compared on cases with heat source terms: all schemes converge towards the same solution as the mesh is refined.Keywords: compressible flow; pressure-correction algorithm; Godunov scheme; finite volume conservative scheme; positivity; total enthalpy conservation eps relative precision for the iterative solver -ncel number of cells of the mesh -ntg number of momentum-enthalpy-pressure global iterations -nthm number of enthalpy-pressure sub-iterations -h enthalpy h = H −